Monkey see. Monkey do.

Inspired by andrea’s recent post with the same title (different punctuation), and for my own amusement, I decided it was time to get this blog rated.

Online Dating

“This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words:

  • dead (3x)
  • hell (1x)”

If I’m getting PG from that, I’m wondering what some of my reading list will get rated.  So I’m tagging: , , , and ScribeMama.

Alexa Clark

Alexa is a digital marketer and author with over 20 years in digital & interactive communications in the food and tech industries. Alexa's CheapEats Restaurant Guides, for both Toronto & Ottawa, were Canadian best sellers. She is a recognized authority on social media and has been named one of Canada's 20 Leading Women in Social Media.

4 thoughts on “Monkey see. Monkey do.

  • July 19, 2007 at 9:19 am
    Permalink

    I got PG based on the use of the word, “pain.” My original blog got PG based on the use of the word, “fart.” Good gods, who designed this rating system??!

    Reply
  • July 19, 2007 at 11:40 am
    Permalink

    NC-17! Woot! Look at my Blleeeep! It’s Bleeep all over your Bleeep!

    Reply
  • July 19, 2007 at 12:41 pm
    Permalink

    ScribeMama – hunh… “pain”, I guess it depends on the context. I tested “unsweetened.vox.com” and got “G” based on the use of the word “suck”… isn’t that more PG than “dead” or “pain” or “hell”?
    Deadrobot – Bleeping excellent. But where does NC17 rate wrt XX?? Cuz you certainly can be naughty (in the good way)

    Reply
  • July 19, 2007 at 4:47 pm
    Permalink

    XXX is an outright Porno. Brazilian waxed, “chukka chukka waaa”, “Hi! I’m delivering pizzas!” porno.
    NC-17 has a “reputable” story but shows naughty bits in action. Repeatedly I think. But not as much as above.
    Obviously I’m not really sure. I think David Cronenburg’s Crash was NC-17. I can’t check that at work.

    Reply

What do you think?