Monkey see. Monkey do.

Inspired by andrea’s recent post with the same title (different punctuation), and for my own amusement, I decided it was time to get this blog rated.

Online Dating

“This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words:

  • dead (3x)
  • hell (1x)”

If I’m getting PG from that, I’m wondering what some of my reading list will get rated.  So I’m tagging: , , , and ScribeMama.

Alexa Clark

Alexa is a digital marketer and author with over 20 years in digital & interactive communications in the food and tech industries. Alexa's CheapEats Restaurant Guides, for both Toronto & Ottawa, were Canadian best sellers. She is a recognized authority on social media and has been named one of Canada's 20 Leading Women in Social Media.

4 thoughts on “Monkey see. Monkey do.

  • July 19, 2007 at 9:19 am

    I got PG based on the use of the word, “pain.” My original blog got PG based on the use of the word, “fart.” Good gods, who designed this rating system??!

  • July 19, 2007 at 11:40 am

    NC-17! Woot! Look at my Blleeeep! It’s Bleeep all over your Bleeep!

  • July 19, 2007 at 12:41 pm

    ScribeMama – hunh… “pain”, I guess it depends on the context. I tested “” and got “G” based on the use of the word “suck”… isn’t that more PG than “dead” or “pain” or “hell”?
    Deadrobot – Bleeping excellent. But where does NC17 rate wrt XX?? Cuz you certainly can be naughty (in the good way)

  • July 19, 2007 at 4:47 pm

    XXX is an outright Porno. Brazilian waxed, “chukka chukka waaa”, “Hi! I’m delivering pizzas!” porno.
    NC-17 has a “reputable” story but shows naughty bits in action. Repeatedly I think. But not as much as above.
    Obviously I’m not really sure. I think David Cronenburg’s Crash was NC-17. I can’t check that at work.


What do you think?

%d bloggers like this: